A Dime a Dozen Blog

Harper’s “Three ‘F’s”

with 2 comments

This is the audio from a speech Stephen Harper gave last night.  The audio is from David Akin’s site, I’ve chopped it up to get to two important parts.

Part One – Stephen Harper on Libertarians

Part Two – Stephen Harper defines Conservative as “Faith, Family, Freedom”

I, like many people I’ve met, signed up for the Tories, and did countless hours of work for them because I believed in their published principles – the very Libertarian principles which you can see here on their website.

If I wanted ‘faith’ I’d join the Green Party.

Look again at the bit of Harper’s speech on the three ‘F’s:

Freedom must be tempered by faith – or more broadly, what faith in all its forms teaches … it teaches us that freedom is not an end in itself.  That how freedom is exercised, matters as much as freedom.  Freedom must be used well, and freedom can only be sustained if it is used well … the libertarian says let individuals exercise full freedom and take full responsibility for their actions … Conservatism cannot just be about freedom, it must be about policies which ensure freedom will lead to good choices, to responsible choices … with wider benefits to all of us.

It makes sense.  Or rather, it makes Harper’s actions over the last 6 months make sense.  If faith means anything, it means ’sacrifice’ – sacrifice of our free speech, our hopes for a democratic senate, sacrifice of western producers to eastern corporate welfare queens …

I’m inclined to get really pissed off and say that if I as an atheist am not welcome in the party, fine, I’ll go through my lot in with the Libertarians.

But then there’s another part of me that says ’screw Harper’, he can read the party principles the same as any of us, he definitely heard the party militants speak at the last convention – libertarian Tories and all their cash and effort were well represented.

The problem is not the libertarians or the neo-liberals in the party membership – the problem is the leader.

Written by Robert Jago

March 14, 2009 at 4:27 am

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. But Robert, he’s not going to bail out the CBC. That’s one good thing. And besides, if there is another right of centre sort of party competing for votes, what will that accomplish? Another minority government, or worse yet, the Libs back in power. There is no perfect choice. Some are just better than others.

    Louise

    March 14, 2009 at 6:19 pm

  2. Look at what it was like with a hard right party in opposition under Chretien. We got more done then, than now.

    And no one will bail out the CBC, their budget hasn’t gone up since 1973.

    There is no perfect choice – but for us neo-liberals and libertarians in the party – the deal we have with the tories, it gets worse every month. We have got a scintilla of movement on guns, but on all of our other issues we’ve got naught.

    I think the party should look at getting a new leader that will show some respect to our faction. And if they don’t then we would be much better served with a strong libertarian opposition – something about the size of the Green party – big enough to sway the public debate.

    Robert Jago

    March 14, 2009 at 10:28 pm


Leave a Reply