Yesterday he put a post explaining why Nanos is more accurate than his competitors:
In short:
1) He asks an open ended question.
2) He pays more for cell phone numbers.
Makes sense to me.
I was dubious. Well, I wasn’t the numbers were bad, so I was in denial. New numbers today and I have seen the light. Cherniak is right – these make sense to me:
Question: If a FEDERAL election were held today, could you please rank your top two current local voting preferences? (First ranked reported)
Committed Voters – Canada (N=996, MoE ± 3.1%, 19 times out of 20)
- Conservative Party 38 (+3)
- Liberal Party 27 (-3)
- NDP 21 (-1)
- BQ 8% (+1)
- Green Party 6% (NC)
- Undecided 17% (-1)
