<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada&#8217;s Top 25 Political Blogs &#8211; December</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Lim</title>
		<link>http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/comment-page-1/#comment-9049</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/#comment-9049</guid>
		<description>That was a great list and will follow up with those blogs. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a great list and will follow up with those blogs. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJeffery</title>
		<link>http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/comment-page-1/#comment-3755</link>
		<dc:creator>DJeffery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/#comment-3755</guid>
		<description>&quot;To search engine newbies, remember that Google ranking is, fundamentally, a function of the number of inbound links. Any links to angrygwn.mu.nu are seen as to a different site because I&#039;ve parked stevejanke.com on it. So to Google, each of these two sites are different and have, say, 200 links each, and are ranked accordingly. With a 301 redirect, Google treats the sites as the same, and credits the main site (stevejanke.com) with all the links from the other domain (angrygwn.mu.nu). Now with 400 inbound links, I zip up the rankings.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To search engine newbies, remember that Google ranking is, fundamentally, a function of the number of inbound links. Any links to angrygwn.mu.nu are seen as to a different site because I&#8217;ve parked stevejanke.com on it. So to Google, each of these two sites are different and have, say, 200 links each, and are ranked accordingly. With a 301 redirect, Google treats the sites as the same, and credits the main site (stevejanke.com) with all the links from the other domain (angrygwn.mu.nu). Now with 400 inbound links, I zip up the rankings.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/comment-page-1/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>Thx.  Yeah.  I was thinking about including Geist but decided against it because it&#039;s a slippery slope.  He&#039;s more of a topical blogger not a political blogger.  That is to say that he only writes on politics as they relate to a single topic.

As soon as I include him, then I ought to start including other topical bloggers.  For example, the BaconEatingAtheistJew I linked to earlier in the post.  He just writes about atheism - granted he&#039;s very political about it, but it&#039;s just one topic.

I can be proved wrong of course, so if anyone wants to convince me that my logic is off on this they are very welcome to.  Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx.  Yeah.  I was thinking about including Geist but decided against it because it&#8217;s a slippery slope.  He&#8217;s more of a topical blogger not a political blogger.  That is to say that he only writes on politics as they relate to a single topic.</p>
<p>As soon as I include him, then I ought to start including other topical bloggers.  For example, the BaconEatingAtheistJew I linked to earlier in the post.  He just writes about atheism &#8211; granted he&#8217;s very political about it, but it&#8217;s just one topic.</p>
<p>I can be proved wrong of course, so if anyone wants to convince me that my logic is off on this they are very welcome to.  Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saskboy</title>
		<link>http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/comment-page-1/#comment-3627</link>
		<dc:creator>saskboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/canadas-top-25-political-blogs-december/#comment-3627</guid>
		<description>Thanks again for doing the list. I see you decided against including Michael Geist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again for doing the list. I see you decided against including Michael Geist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
